VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNTS FOR HYDROCEPHALUS - A FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION ON THE SELECTION OF SHUNT SYSTEMS IN PEDIATRICS - A REPORT OF THE PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY RESEARCH GROUP MEETING, DECEMBER 1992
He. James et Da. Bruce, VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNTS FOR HYDROCEPHALUS - A FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION ON THE SELECTION OF SHUNT SYSTEMS IN PEDIATRICS - A REPORT OF THE PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY RESEARCH GROUP MEETING, DECEMBER 1992, Child's nervous system, 11(8), 1995, pp. 449-451
As part of the Continuing Quality Improvement Study, phase I, 12 pedia
tric neurosurgeons participated in a discussion group to respond to th
e various issues related to selection of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sy
stems in their practice. It was estimated that between then all the 12
participants performed approximately 1200 shunt procedures per year i
n the USA. The data were analyzed by grid and fish-bone charts as part
of the data collection. All 12 participants indicated that they prefe
rred a reservoir in the shunt system, 8 of them indicating that they p
referred this for a manual test of the system. Three indicated that th
ey did not routinely manipulate the system for testing. One participan
t stated that he placed a reservoir within the shunt system primarily
to prevent migration of the ventricular catheter. Nine neurosurgeons i
ndicated that they employed cranial valves in their shunt systems, and
three indicated that they employed slit-end peritoneal catheters only
. In reference to Delta valves, nine participants indicated that they
employed them on occasions. In reference to pressure in the valve syst
em, one participant employed high-pressure valves at all times, five e
mployed only medium-pressure systems, and the remaining six always emp
loyed low-pressure valves. All 12 neurosurgeons stated that the incide
nce of symptomatic slit ventricle in their practices was between 1% an
d 5%, in their mind irrespective of the system used. It was con eluded
that any form of ventriculoperitoneal shunt, with or without valves,
with slit-end valves or cranial valves seemed to work equally well in
the hands of a dedicated pediatric neurological surgeon. This suggests
that there is little scientific basis by which the pediatric neurosur
geon selects a shunt system in the United States. It also indicates th
e need for a comprehensive approach to the most frequent operation per
formed in pediatric neurosurgical practice. It is suggested that some
form of prospective study or centralized data bank registry be institu
ted where information can be analyzed, documented and processed.