MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE APPENDIX

Citation
R. Cortina et al., MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE APPENDIX, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 38(8), 1995, pp. 848-852
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00123706
Volume
38
Issue
8
Year of publication
1995
Pages
848 - 852
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(1995)38:8<848:MAPOAO>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adenocarcinoma of the appendix is a rare neoplasm, and contro versies persist regarding management. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors and define management strategies for pati ents with adenocarcinoma of the appendix. METHODS: A retrospective cas e series was conducted at three medical school teaching hospitals over a 20-year period from 1972 to 1992. Overall survival was determined b y the actuarial life table method. Comparisons of prognostic factors w ere made using exact nonparametric log-rank tests. RESULTS: Thirteen p atients were diagnosed during the study period. Median age was 62 year s. There were five males and eight females. The disease was not suspec ted in any patient preoperatively. Seventy-seven percent of patients h ad metastatic disease at presentation. Second primary malignancies mer e found in 15 percent of patients. Thirty-eight percent of female pati ents had synchronous ovarian lesions. Median survival was 22 months, w ith an estimated five-year survival of 43 percent (95 percent confiden ce interval, 22-84 percent). Patients with colonic histology had signi ficantly worse survival than patients with mucinous histology (P = 0.0 093). Patients with carcinomatosis had a significantly worse survival than noncarcinomatosis patients (P = 0.0078). Patients who underwent r ight hemicolectomy had a better prognosis for survival than appendecto my patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. CON CLUSIONS: Carcinoma of the appendix is very difficult to diagnose preo peratively, and most patients are not identified until disease is adva nced. Good prognostic factors include mucinous histology and the absen ce of carcinomatosis. Right hemicolectomy appears to be a reasonable o ption, although its superiority to appendectomy alone has not been. de finitively proven. High frequency of ovarian metastases in women sugge sts a role for bilateral oophorectomy. In addition, a complete work-up of the patient for a synchronous malignancy, especially in the gastro intestinal tract, should be considered.