RADIATION TREATMENT OF CERVICAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASES FROM AN UNKNOWNPRIMARY - AN ANALYSIS OF OUTCOME BY TREATMENT VOLUME AND OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

Citation
L. Weir et al., RADIATION TREATMENT OF CERVICAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASES FROM AN UNKNOWNPRIMARY - AN ANALYSIS OF OUTCOME BY TREATMENT VOLUME AND OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, Radiotherapy and oncology, 35(3), 1995, pp. 206-211
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
01678140
Volume
35
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
206 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8140(1995)35:3<206:RTOCLM>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
One hundred and forty-four patients with diagnosis of carcinoma involv ing cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site were seen at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto between 1970 and 1986. This paper addresses the outcome of two treatment approaches using radiation tre atment as potentially curative therapy, The treatment approaches compa red in a retrospective analysis are radiation to the involved node reg ions alone (85 cases), and radiation to both the nodes and to potentia l primary sites in the head and neck (59 cases). The overall 5-year su rvival rate of the entire group of 144 cases was 41%. There was a tren d to increased survival in favour of the group receiving radiation to the nodes and potential primary sites (p = 0.07), however, when differ ences in extent of nodal involvement were considered and adjusted for using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model, no difference in survival, or cause-specific survival was found between the two treatment groups (p = 0.18 and 0.22, respectively). A total of seven head and neck primar y cancers were subsequently discovered, six in the group receiving rad iation only to the nodes and one in the group receiving radiation to t he nodes and primary sites, The results of this retrospective analysis need to be interpreted with caution but suggest that, for some patien ts with this diagnosis, radiation to the involved node region alone is adequate. A discussion of the literature is presented with attention to the effect of extent of treatment on outcome.