M. Hu et al., MECHANISMS OF TRANSPORT OF QUINAPRIL IN CACO-2 CELL MONOLAYERS - COMPARISON WITH CEPHALEXIN, Pharmaceutical research, 12(8), 1995, pp. 1120-1125
Purpose. To determine the transport mechanisms of quinapril and cephal
exin in Caco-2 cell monolayers, a cell culture model of the human smal
l intestinal epithelium. Methods. Uptake, transepithelial transport an
d intracellular accumulations of these two drugs were measured using C
aco-5 cell monolayers grown onto Millicells(TM) and magnetically stirr
ed diffusion chambers. Results. Transepithelial transport, apical (AP)
(4) uptake and intracellular accumulation of both drugs depended on th
e maintenance of a transepithelial proton gradient and temperature of
the medium. However, quinapril transport and accumulation, which did n
ot display a maximum at approximately pH 6, was more sensitive to prot
on gradient change, whereas cephalexin transport was more sensitive to
concentration change (range 0.5-5 mM). In addition, quinapril (1 mM)
transport was decreased significantly (p<0.05) by 10 mM cephalexin, Io
racarbef, Gly-Pro and Phe-Pro, but not by enalapril; whereas cephalexi
n (0.1 mM) transport was decreased significantly (p<0.05) by all four
compounds. Similarly, AP quinapril (1 mM) uptake was also decreased by
10 mM Ioracarbef, Gly-Pro, cephalexin, and enalapril, but these inhib
itory effects (20-50%) were quantitatively less than their inhibitory
effects on cephalexin uptake (50-90%). Finally, the AP uptake of quina
pril was also significantly (p<0.05) inhibited by FCCP (10 mu g/ml), a
miloride (0.5 mM), DEP (0.5 mM), and staurosporine (5 nM). Conclusions
. The transport of quinapril in the Caco-2 cells is via a combination
of the carrier-mediated proton gradient-dependent peptide transporter
and passive diffusion.