K. Meyers et al., THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ADDICTION SEVERITY INDEX FOR ADOLESCENTS (CASI-A) - AN INTERVIEW FOR ASSESSING MULTIPLE PROBLEMS OF ADOLESCENTS, Journal of substance abuse treatment, 12(3), 1995, pp. 181-193
The Comprehensive Addiction Severity Index for Adolescents (CASI-A) is
a 45 to 90-minute comprehensive, semi-structured clinical interview f
or evaluating adolescents who present for treatment at various provide
r agencies. CASI-A modules and their individual items were selected an
d revised based on theory, clinical wisdom, and adolescent experiences
obtained during pilot interviews and focus groups. The CASI-A assesse
s known risk factors, concomitant symptomatology, and consequences of
adolescent alcohol/drug use within seven primary areas of functioning:
education status, alcohol/drug use, family relationships, peer relati
onships, legal status, psychiatric distress, and use of free time. The
CASI-A is not a diagnostic or screening instrument, but rather a clin
ical assessment tool that obtains clinically pertinent information des
igned to guide treatment planning and to evaluate treatment outcome. T
he CASI-A's design makes it suitable for administration in a variety o
f settings, for repeat administration at posttreatment follow-up evalu
ations, and for assessment of virtually all adolescents in treatment r
egardless of their admission problem. Overall, the CASI-A has encourag
ing but preliminary evidence of validity and internal consistency. Inf
ormation collected soon after admission during administration of the C
ASI-A by nonclinical interviewers corresponded quite well with that ob
tained over the course of the adolescent's treatment stay by the entir
e treatment ream. Revisions to the instrument are being made in those
areas where correspondence between information on the CASI-A and that
extracted from clinical records dropped below 75%, or in those early s
ubscales, where alpha coefficients dropped below.6. As a result of the
encouraging results reported in this paper, we are beginning addition
al psychometric testing, refining the proposed scoring system, and dev
eloping a computerized data entry, scoring, and report system.