Congress is poised to initiate what could be a lengthy debate over the
U;S. Endangered Species Act. In anticipation, proponents of strong Fi
fth Amendment private property rights guarantees have begun an aggress
ive campaign pining those rights against those granted other species i
n the Act. Little case law exists that considers both property, rights
and wildlife protection, but inference can be drawn from Supreme Cour
t opinions regarding property rights which may provide insight into li
kely judicial contributions to resolving tension between property righ
ts and endangered species. We review key legislative history, provisio
ns of the Endangered Species Act, relevant case law and the implicatio
ns of recent judicial trends that pertain to property and imperiled sp
ecies. We then make recommendations that may improve implementation of
this critical piece of environmental legislation.