G. Boriani et al., PROPAFENONE FOR CONVERSION OF RECENT-ONSET ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - A CONTROLLED COMPARISON BETWEEN ORAL LOADING DOSE AND INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION, Chest, 108(2), 1995, pp. 355-358
Study objective: To compare placebo vs two different regimens of propa
fenone administration-intravenous administration or short-term oral lo
ading-in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.
Design: Single-blind placebo-controlled study. Patients: Eighty-seven
patients with atrial fibrillation of recent onset (less than or equal
to 7 days' duration) admitted to the hospital without signs of organic
heart disease (n=42) or with systemic hypertension without signs or s
ymptoms of heart failure (n=45). The patients were assigned randomly t
o treatment with intravenous propafenone (29 patients), oral propafeno
ne (29 patients), or placebo (29 patients). Interventions: Administrat
ion of propafenone intravenously (2-mg/kg bolus followed by 0.0078 mg/
kg/min) or as short-term oral loading (600 mg orally single dose). Pat
ients were submitted to Holter monitoring and conversion to sinus rhyt
hm was evaluated at 1, 3, and 8 h. Results: Conversion to sinus rhythm
was obtained within 1 h in 28% with intravenous propafenone, in 3% wi
th oral propafenone, and in 3% with placebo, At 3 h, the efficacy of i
ntravenous propafenone (41%) and of oral propafenone (55%) were statis
tically superior to placebo (10% of conversions) and at 8 h either int
ravenous or oral propafenone were effective in almost two thirds of th
e patients with a statistical difference vs placebo, whose efficacy wa
s 24%, No major side effects were observed. Conclusions: Propafenone a
s an oral loading dose is an efficacious and fast way of treating atri
al fibrillation of recent onset and due to its simplicity of administr
ation and safety can be preferred to the intravenous route.