N. Herrera et al., NICOTINE GUM, 2 AND 4 MG, FOR NICOTINE DEPENDENCE - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL WITHIN A BEHAVIOR-MODIFICATION SUPPORT PROGRAM, Chest, 108(2), 1995, pp. 447-451
The effectiveness ofnicotine gum in combination with a behavior modifi
cation program was studied. The nicotine dependence of participating s
mokers (N=322) was assessed. One hundred sixty-eight smokers were labe
led as high nicotine dependent and 154 as moderate to low dependent. I
n a randomized double-blind procedure, the high-dependent smokers were
given gum containing 4 mg of nicotine (87) or 2 mg of nicotine (81) a
nd the smokers with medium or low dependence were given gum containing
2 mg (76) or a placebo gum (78). The smokers were also randomized to
familiarizing themselves with the medication a week before quit day (1
12) or to regular use, that is starting gum use on the quit day (122).
In the high-dependent group, sustained and chemically verified nonsmo
king rates at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years were, respectively, 60%, 39
%, and 34% in the subjects given the 4-mg dose compared with 41%, 16%,
and 16% for those using the 2-mg dose, In the group with medium or lo
w dependence, the success rates at the same time periods were 70%, 49%
, and 39% for the subjects given the 2-mg dose and 38%, 22%, and 17% f
or those given placebo gum. The differences in success rates were sign
ificant at least at the p<0.02% level for all comparisons. Familiarizi
ng with the gum as compared with regular use gave fewer reports of sid
e effects, 15% vs 34%, p<0,001. A trend toward better success rates at
6 weeks, although not statistically significant, was observed for the
familiarization group, 61% vs 52%. The study shows that high nicotine
-dependent smokers need higher doses of nicotine replacement, in this
case the 4-mg dose rather than the 2-mg dose, whereas 2 mg is superior
to placebo among less dependent smokers, These results compare favora
bly with those reported from the more recent nicotine patch therapy.