Sa. Strathdee et al., USE OF POOLING AND OUTPATIENT LABORATORY SPECIMENS IN AN ANONYMOUS SEROPREVALENCE SURVEY OF HIV-INFECTION IN BRITISH-COLUMBIA, CANADA, AIDS, 9(8), 1995, pp. 945-950
Objective: To conduct an anonymous HIV seroprevalence survey to establ
ish a baseline estimate;of HIV seroprevalence in a general population;
to evaluate serum pooling and alternative testing strategies as cost-
saving measures. Design: Prospective anonymous HIV seroprevalence stud
y using outpatient laboratory specimens. Setting: Two large non-hospit
al-associated outpatient chemistry testing laboratories in the major p
opulation centers in British Columbia, Canada. Patients and sera: Left
over sera received for chemistry screen testing in outpatient laborato
ries were provided to the study after chemistry testing was completed.
Those from patients aged <15 and greater than or equal to 55 years we
re excluded. Methods: Patient identifiers were erased from samples. Se
ra were pooled 10:1 and tested by viral lysate enzyme-linked immunosor
bent assay (ELISA). Sera from HIV-positive pools were tested individua
lly. All individual HIV-positive specimens were retested for verificat
ion of positivity using a recombinant protein ELISA. Main outcome meas
ures: HIV seroprevalence rates were stratified by sex, age group, and
geographic area; and costs of pooling and alternative algorithm strate
gy were compared with those of conventional methods. Results: A total
of 80 238 sera were collected from 66 658 individuals (53% women, 47%
men). Of these, 276 men (88.3 per 10000) and 24 women (6.8 per 10000)
were HIV-seropositive. The highest rates were in those aged 30-34 year
s, for both men and women. Using pooling and non-Western blot verifica
tion saved US$2.07 per specimen, or 80% of the cost for conventional t
esting. Conclusions: The anonymous outpatient laboratory setting is pr
acticable to obtain a reasonable estimate of HIV seroprevalence rates
in a general population. Such studies can be made cost-effective by po
oling sera and using alternative confirmatory strategies.