In June 1995 Shell UK announced its intention not to dispose of the Br
ent Spar in accordance with the declared Best Practicable Environmenta
l Option, that of disposal in the deep sea, suggesting first that this
would mean a land-based disposal option would be sought, but later it
s intention to invite and consider any option that was put forward, Th
is decision which followed one of the most public environmental protes
ts in Europe has thrown North Sea abandonment into the public spotligh
t, and leaves the existing legal and policy approaches to the abandonm
ent of the northern North Sea oil fields in a state of confusion, This
paper seeks to investigate the circumstances which led to this about-
turn and to elaborate the possible consequences of this in terms of th
e policy approaches and specific procedures previously adopted to sati
sfy the requirements of international law, More specifically it seeks
to identify the circumstances which might allow for a successful futur
e partial abandonment option (i.e. one that involves the disposal of p
art or parts of an installation at sea), and attempts some conclusions
regarding the influence of science and broader societal values on suc
h decisions. Copyright (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.