A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY AND BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE IN PERENNIAL RHINITIS - EFFICACY IN ALLERGIC AND NONALLERGIC PERENNIAL RHINITIS
Gk. Scadding et al., A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY AND BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE IN PERENNIAL RHINITIS - EFFICACY IN ALLERGIC AND NONALLERGIC PERENNIAL RHINITIS, Clinical and experimental allergy, 25(8), 1995, pp. 737-743
Background Fluticasone propionate is a new potent, topically active co
rticosteroid with negligable oral bioavailability. Data on its compara
tive efficacy in perennial allergic and non-allergic rhinitis are limi
ted. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propi
onate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 mu g once or twice daily with be
clomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray (BDP) 200 mu g twice dai
ly and placebo in patients with allergic and nonallergic perennial rhi
nitis. Methods The 12-week study had a multicentre, double-blind, rand
omized, parallel group design. Efficacy was assessed from symptom scor
es recorded on daily diary cards. Results FPANS 200 mu g once or twice
daily was significantly better than placebo but not better than BDP i
n relieving the nasal symptoms of rhinitis. FPANS at either dose was e
qually effective in the treatment of allergic and non-allergic perenni
al rhinitis. There were few adverse events and no treatment-related ab
normalities in laboratory measurements in either FPANS-treated group.
Comparisons between treatment groups indicated that FPANS was as well
tolerated as placebo and BDP at the doses studied. Conclusions In the
majority of patients FPANS 200 mu g once daily is as effective as BDP
200 mu g twice daily in the relief of perennial allergic rhinitis.