Jg. Gerber et Na. Payne, THE ROLE OF GASTRIC HISTAMINE-RELEASE IN THE ACID SECRETORY RESPONSE TO PENTAGASTRIN AND METHACHOLINE IN THE DOG, Inflammation research, 44(8), 1995, pp. 327-334
We have previously demonstrated that both pentagastrin and methacholin
e can stimulate histamine release from the canine stomach during short
term administration of the secretagogues into the gastrosplenic arter
y. In this study we tested the hypothesis that gastric histamine relea
se determines the acid secretory response to acid secretagogues. Incre
asing doses of pentagastrin (2, 6, and 20 ng/kg/min) and methacholine
(0.1, 0.3, and 1 mu g/min) were infused into the gastrosplenic artery
in dogs, while gastric acid output, histamine and N-tau-methyl histami
ne secretory rates were monitored. Histamine and N-tau-methyl histamin
e concentrations in plasma were measured using GC/NICI-MS. Increasing
doses of pentagastrin resulted in increasing gastric output. Total his
tamine secretory rate expressed as the sum of histamine and N-tau-meth
yl histamine secretory rate showed a significant increase above basal
with the two highest doses of pentagastrin. Regression analysis correl
ating the dose of pentagastrin to gastric acid output gave a correlati
on coefficient of 0.586 which was very significant. Regression analysi
s correlating the total histamine secretory rate to acid output gave a
correlation coefficient of 0.498 which was also very significant. Inc
reasing doses of methacholine also resulted in a dose-dependent increa
se in acid output. Histamine secretory rates showed a statistically si
gnificant increase above basal only at the 1 mu g/min infusion rate, h
owever, the total histamine secretory rates (histamine+N-tau-methyl hi
stamine) were no longer significant at any of the doses of methacholin
e. Regression analysis correlating the dose of methacholine to gastric
acid output gave a correlation coefficient of 0.571 which was signifi
cant, while correlating the histamine secretory rate to acid output ga
ve a correlation coefficient of 0.338, not significant, which decrease
d to 0.079 when the total histamine secretory rates were correlated to
acid output. Sixty-eight min infusions of pentagastrin demonstrated a
dose-dependent, pulse-like but persistent increase in histamine secre
tory rate above basal, while long-term infusion of methacholine gave a
flat, low-grade histamine stimulation. These data suggest that for pe
ntagastrin, both the dose of pentagastrin and the amount of histamine
released determine the acid secretory response with this secretagogue,
but the dose of pentagastrin correlates more strongly with acid outpu
t. During cholinergic stimulated acid output, only the dose of methach
oline correlates with acid output. Thus, for cholinergic stimulated ga
stric acid output, histamine is not likely to be a final mediator, but
for gastrin both its direct action at the parietal cell and the amoun
t of histamine released appear to contribute to the acid secretory res
ponse.