AN INDEX OF PAST ASBESTOS EXPOSURE AS APPLIED TO CAR AND BUS MECHANICS

Citation
N. Plato et al., AN INDEX OF PAST ASBESTOS EXPOSURE AS APPLIED TO CAR AND BUS MECHANICS, The Annals of occupational hygiene, 39(4), 1995, pp. 441-454
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology,"Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00034878
Volume
39
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
441 - 454
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4878(1995)39:4<441:AIOPAE>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Different ways to describe historic fibre exposure from asbestos-conta ining friction materials were studied and compared for a group of 103 car and bus mechanics with more than 20 years employment and 15 years of asbestos exposure. A model was constructed to calculate cumulative asbestos exposure from friction materials including duration, intensit y and exposure last year. The model is a combination of an additive an d a multiplicative model, where an asbestos index was constructed that takes both near field and far field exposure into consideration. The model was based upon data from the international literature and quanti tative asbestos measurements performed 1976-1988 in Swedish car repair workshops. The fibres were counted by phase-contrast microscopy with fibre criteria of length > 5 mu m and aspect ratio greater than or equ al to 3:1. The mechanics' fibre exposure at 398 repair workshops durin g a period of 48 years were calculated using the model. The mean cumul ative exposure was estimated to be 2.6 f ml(-1) year. The annual cumul ative exposure was highest for truck mechanics in the early 1960s. The car mechanics had a time-weighted average fibre exposure range of 0.1 1-0.41 f ml(-1) (mean 0.21 f ml(-1))in 1965 compared to 0.003-0.08 f m l(-1) (mean 0.021 f ml(-1))in 1985. In order to validate the model, th e mechanics' fibre exposure estimated using the model were compared wi th representative asbestos exposure measurements for car mechanics dur ing the 1960s and the 1970s (correlation coefficient = 0.69). Five lun g physiological variables (FVC, TLC, FEV(1), TL(co) and CV%) were used to study exposure-response relationships. None of the exposure parame ters suggested any significant relationship between exposure and decre ase in lung function.