P. Latikka et al., CORRELATIONS OF ISOKINETIC AND PSYCHOPHYSICAL BACK LIFT AND STATIC BACK EXTENSOR ENDURANCE TESTS IN MEN, Clinical biomechanics, 10(6), 1995, pp. 325-330
lsokinetic lift, psychophysical lift, and static back endurance tests
are among the most widely used measurements of muscle function for det
ermining risk for, and recovery from, back problems. After determining
test repeatability we examined the degree of association between thes
e test measures in 100 men selected to represent a variety of occupati
ons and lifestyles. Isokinetic lifting had low correlations with test
results for psychophysical lifting (r = 0.28) and static back enduranc
e (r = 0.24). Static back endurance and psychophysical lift test resul
ts were not at all correlated (r = 0.03). Muscle function measurements
for back problems are sometimes arbitrarily selected due to health pr
actioners' beliefs and preferences or practical reasons such as the av
ailability of equipment. Yet little is known about the associations of
these tests with one another or with anthropometric factors. The data
presented in this study document that isokinetic lift, psychophysical
lift, and static back endurance tests appear to measure very differen
t aspects of muscle function, and comparing studies using these differ
ent test methods should be approached with these low inter-test correl
ations in mind.