New computer technologies to aid group communication and decision maki
ng are becoming increasingly widespread. This study analyzes how one s
uch technology, a group decision support system (GDSS), affected how g
roup decisions developed over time. The study contrasted decision path
s in groups using the GDSS with groups using the same procedural struc
tures incorporated in the GDSS manually and with groups using no proce
dural structures. A flexible phase mapping method was employed to map
group decision paths. The resulting set of seven decision paths varied
in both sequence and number of decision phases. An optimal matching p
rocedure was used to compute similarity measures among the 40 paths, a
nd cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling were used to generate
an empirical taxonomy of decision paths. Results indicated that the n
ature of decision paths varied both across the three conditions and wi
thin conditions. The decision path types were also related to three ou
tcome variables: consensus change, perceived decision qualify, and dec
ision scheme satisfaction. Results indicated that those decision paths
that most resembled logical normative sequences had superior outcomes
to those that did not.