A COMPARISON OF THE PEPTIDE FRAGMENTATION OBTAINED FROM A REFLECTOR MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION-IONIZATION TIME-OF-FLIGHT AND A TANDEM4-SECTOR MASS-SPECTROMETER
Jc. Rouse et al., A COMPARISON OF THE PEPTIDE FRAGMENTATION OBTAINED FROM A REFLECTOR MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION-IONIZATION TIME-OF-FLIGHT AND A TANDEM4-SECTOR MASS-SPECTROMETER, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 6(9), 1995, pp. 822-835
The types, extent, and overall distribution of peptide fragmentation p
roduced by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization-postsource deca
y (MALDI-PSD) on a reflector time-of-flight mass spectrometer were com
pared with those obtained from high and low energy collision-induced d
issociation (CID) on a four-sector mass spectrometer and from liquid s
econdary ion mass spectrometry (LSIMS) ion source fragmentation and LS
IMS metastable ion (MI) decomposition on a two-sector mass spectromete
r. The model peptides studied had sequences and compositions that yiel
ded predominantly either N- or C-terminal fragmentation from CID. For
des-Arg(1) and des-Arg(9) bradykinin (i.e., H-PPGFSPFR-OH and H-RPPGFS
PF-OH, respectively), the types of fragment ions and the extent to whi
ch each type is formed in both MALDI-PSD and low energy CID spectra ar
e remarkably similar. This observation suggests that both methods depo
sit comparable internal energies (IE) into [M + H](+) precursor ions.
The distribution of N-terminal, C-terminal, immonium, and internal fra
gmentation from MALDI-PSD spectra of des-Arg(1) and des-Arg(9) bradyki
nin did not change dramatically with respect to the terminal arginine
position, contrary to those from LSIMS MI decomposition, high and low
energy CID spectra. This observation in combination with the prominent
immonium, internal, and minus 17 fragment ion types in PSD indicates
that the imparted IE from MALDI and the 14 mu s of flight time may pro
mote steady-state decomposition kinetics. Fragmentation distributions
of MALDI-PSD spectra are also similar to those in LSIMS spectra. This
implies that the distribution of protonation sites in [M + H](+) is co
mparable for both techniques.