Certain human papaillomavirus (HPV) types are major risk factors for t
he development of cervical neoplasia. The value of HPV DNA testing in
the management of patients with disease and in population screening is
a subject of controversy. Since the introduction of molecular biology
into the HPV field, there have been rapid advances and improvements i
n HPV diagnosis. The various molecular diagnostic methods for detectio
n of HPV DNA (dot blot hybridization, Southern blot hybridization, in
situ hybridization, Hybrid Capture Test, and polymerase chain reaction
; PCR) could be selected by faking into consideration some factors suc
h as characterstics of sample, sensitivity of HPV test and expenses. T
he HPV DNA testing would be a clinically useful diagnostic method, whe
n used in conjunction with the Pap smear in population screening or in
conjunction with cytology and colposcopy to identify the women infect
ed with high-risk HPVs or women who had equivocal cervical lesions. De
spite the confusion, a multitude of reports demonstrate that HPV DNA t
esting has the clinical utility, and future investigations should be d
irected at more accurately delineating its role in human health care.