Tp. Pezzolesi et al., COMPARISON OF SOIL SAMPLING DEVICES USED FOR SAMPLING SUBMERGED SOILS, Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 26(15-16), 1995, pp. 2621-2627
Environmental sampling designed for soil chemical analyses requires pr
ecise procedural collection methods. Furthermore, soils which are subm
erged, represent an enigmatic sampling situation as the sample is with
drawn through the overlaying liquid layer. Contamination may arise fro
m the liquid as well as solid material above the collected sample. A p
rocedural problem is that close-faced, lined samplers do not provide e
nough axial friction to maintain the Sample within the sampler. Since
the choice of proper sampling equipment is critical in site assessment
s, we compared two types of soil probes in this study. Both samples we
re nickel (Ni)-chromium (Cr) plated having 2-cm diameter bores. One wa
s an open-faced slotted sampler while the other was a closed-faced sam
pler with a PETG copolyester liner. The open-faced slotted sampler had
no significantly different Ni or Cr content than did the PETG-lined p
robe and maintained the soil within the sampling tube.