F. Gaspari et al., PLASMA-CLEARANCE OF NONRADIOACTIVE IOHEXOL AS A MEASURE OF GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 6(2), 1995, pp. 257-263
Renal clearance of inulin is the best available indicator of GFR but c
annot be used routinely for clinical purposes and is also difficult to
perform for clinical investigation when repeated measurements are req
uired, The aim of this study was to find a reliable alternative to inu
lin clearance that would allow one to avoid the use of radioactivity a
nd problems related to the continuous infusion of the marker. The plas
ma clearance of unlabeled iohexol, a nonionic contrast agent, was used
. Forty-one patients (creatinine clearance 6 to 160 mL/min per 1.73 m(
2)) underwent simultaneous measurements of renal clearance of inulin a
nd plasma clearance of iohexol. Iohexol was given as a single iv dose,
and blood samples were drawn up to 600 min after the administration.
Iohexol concentrations (by HPLC) were analyzed by a two-compartment, o
pen-model system. A highly significant correlation between the plasma
clearance of iohexol and the renal clearance of inulin over a wide ran
ge of GFR values was found. By analyzing the data with a simplified me
thod that uses a one-compartment model corrected with the Brochner-Mor
tensen formula, an excellent correlation with the inulin clearance was
also observed. When only patients with moderate to severe renal failu
re were considered, a significant correlation between the two methods
was found, A further comparison between GFR determined with iohexol an
d iopromide, a new low-osmolarity, low-viscosity contrast medium, was
also performed in a subgroup of patients. A highly significant correla
tion between the plasma clearance of iohexol and iopromide over a wide
range of GFR values was found. These findings indicate that the propo
sed method of measuring GFR by the plasma clearance of unlabeled iohex
ol or iopromide is a good alternative to the inulin clearance techniqu
e.