We have studied the effects of temperature, NO conversion, and NO-CO r
atio on the activity and selectivity of the NO-CO reaction at high (1
Torr < P < 100 Torr) pressures over the Rh(110) and Rh(111) surfaces.
Under the conditions used in this study, the NO-CO activity, as measur
ed by the rate of NO loss, is between 1.3 and 6.3 times faster over Rh
(110) than over Rh(111), The (110) surface exhibits a lower apparent a
ctivation energy (E(a)), 27.2 vs 34.8 kcal/mol, than does the (111) su
rface. We attribute this behavior to a slightly more facile NO dissoci
ation process on the more open (110) surface. Although the turnover nu
mbers for NO reaction can be quite similar on the two different surfac
es, we find large differences between Rh(110) and Rh(111) with regard
to their selectivities for the two competitive nitrogen-containing pro
ducts, N2O vs N-2. The more open Rh(110) surface tends to make signifi
cantly less N2O than Rh(111) under virtually all conditions that we pr
obed with these experiments, This can be understood in terms of the re
lative surface coverages of adsorbed NO and N atoms on the two surface
s, Notably, more facile NO dissociation on Rh(110) appears to lead to
greater steady-state concentrations of adsorbed N atoms than is presen
t on the (111) surface. Higher N atom coverages on the (110) surface f
avor N atom recombination (N-2 formation) more than the NO + N reactio
n (N2O formation) on Rh(110) relative to Rh(111). Indeed, Rh(110) surf
aces were found to be largely composed of adsorbed N atoms and lesser
quantities of NO in postreaction XPS measurements. In contrast, Rh(111
) surfaces showed only X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy features due t
o adsorbed NO. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.