The debate over the use of contingent valuation for existence values o
r passive-use values has failed to explore the validity of motives for
such values. One potential motive, altruism, has conflicting implicat
ions for benefit-cost analysis, depending on whether the altruist is p
aternalistic. This paper constructs models of three types of altruism
and shows how benefit-cost analysis responds to each type of altruism,
how damage assessment and restoration depend on each type, and the im
plications of a population of heterogeneous altruists. (C) 1997 Academ
ic Press