SOME PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA TO MAKE CANADA PROTECTED AREA SYSTEMS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NATIONS FOREST DIVERSITY

Citation
Eb. Peterson et al., SOME PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA TO MAKE CANADA PROTECTED AREA SYSTEMS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NATIONS FOREST DIVERSITY, Forestry Chronicle, 71(4), 1995, pp. 497-507
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry
Journal title
ISSN journal
00157546
Volume
71
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
497 - 507
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-7546(1995)71:4<497:SPACTM>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The current network of protected areas in Canada, numbering almost 300 0, owes much to initiatives taken under the International Biological P rogram (IBP-CT) beginning in the 1960's, and maintained by member agen cies of the Canadian Council on Ecological Areas (CCEA). Several crite ria for the selection of areas were identified under IBP-CT. The first of these concerned representation of the diversity of the world's eco systems. Recently, the need for protected areas has gained prominence at all levels of government. In its 1992 National Strategy, the forest sector committed itself to protecting the diversity of forest ecosyst ems in Canada. In this review we advocate that representativeness is m ore than a criterion by which areas are selected for protection: it is a fundamental principle. We examine how this principle can be applied and suggest that features of the landscape define the scale on which a comprehensive system of protected areas is built. Also discussed is the role for forest ecosystems that have been disturbed by human activ ity in such a system. Our main recommendation is that landscape should be accepted as the basic stratification by which representation is to be judged. On the assumption that species and species assemblages ass ociated with landscapes are not in jeopardy, and that a representative range of the nation's landscapes will contain a representative range of Canada's biotic diversity, this article suggests that a comprehensi ve system of protected landscapes will, in large measure, represent th e nation's diversity of animal and plant communities. Until it is clea rly evident that timber management can accommodate the broad array of conservation needs, forest managers should consider designating areas for protection in which the integrity of ecosystem functions and dynam ics can be assured for both managed and natural forest types under the ir control.