Standard laboratory posted-offer markets respond slowly and incomplete
ly to demand shocks. In these one-sided markets, where sellers control
the setting of prices, very little information is transmitted via the
process of exchange. For this reason, traders have trouble distinguis
hing randomness in their own experience from changes in market fundame
ntals. This paper reports the results of twelve laboratory markets con
ducted to assess whether some common variants to standard posted-offer
rules can correct the adjustment deficiences. Although discounting, m
ultiple postings and excess demand information all improve performance
, we find that response remains poor, and efficiencies low.