Diagnosis of the personality disorders (PDs) across men and women has
been the focus of considerable controversy in the psychological and ps
ychiatric literature, most of which has concerned the possibility of a
sex bias. However, the interpretation of the differential sex prevale
nce rates reported within the literature is complicated and problemati
c even if one assumes an absence of sex bias. The most recent revision
of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statis
tical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) contains substantia
l revisions in the conclusions presented in an earlier edition of the
manual (DSM-III-R) regarding the existence of sex differences in the P
Ds. This article reviews the empirical support for the conclusions pro
vided in DSM-IV, discusser the complicated nature of interpreting sex
prevalence rates across different samples, and offers a conceptual mod
el for understanding sex differences among the PDs.