Pw. Stratford et J. Binkley, A REVIEW OF THE MCMURRAY TEST - DEFINITION, INTERPRETATION, AND CLINICAL USEFULNESS, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 22(3), 1995, pp. 116-120
Clinicians frequently use the results of clinical diagnostic tests to
make decisions concerning patients. The intent of this paper is to rev
iew the technical aspects and measurement properties of the McMurray t
est and, more globally, to illustrate the impact that indiscriminate t
est application has on test interpretation. The literature shows that
diagnostic accuracy studies, which evaluate the test described by McMu
rray, yield remarkably similar estimates of sensitivity (about 26%) an
d specificity (about 94%) These rest characteristics are applied to th
ree case scenarios to illustrate the impact that history-specific prev
alence (ie., the likelihood a patient has the condition based on the h
istory) has on the predictive values. The results show a high false po
sitive rate when applied to patients who, based on the history, have a
low pre-physical examination likelihood for the condition of interest
and a higher false negative rate when applied to patients who have a
high history-specific prevalence. Readers are warned that the exhausti
ve examination approach effectively lowers the prevalence and results
in a high false positive rate. The impact that the exhaustive approach
has on increasing the false positive rate is universal to all diagnos
tic investigations and is not unique to the McMurray test.