M. Steiner et al., CLIMATOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL STORM STRUCTURE FROMOPERATIONAL RADAR AND RAIN-GAUGE DATA, Journal of applied meteorology, 34(9), 1995, pp. 1978-2007
Three algorithms extract information on precipitation type, structure,
and amount from operational radar and rain gauge data. Tests on one m
onth of data from one site show that the algorithms perform accurately
and provide products that characterize the essential features of the
precipitation climatology. Input to the algorithms are the operational
ly executed volume scans of a radar and the data from a surrounding ra
in gauge network. The algorithms separate the radar echoes into convec
tive and stratiform regions, statistically summarize the vertical stru
cture of the radar echoes, and determine precipitation rates and amoun
ts on high spatial resolution. The convective and stratiform regions a
re separated on the basis of the intensity and sharpness of the peaks
of echo intensity. The peaks indicate the centers of the convective re
gions. Precipitation not identified as convective is stratiform. This
method avoids the problem of underestimating the stratiform precipitat
ion. The separation criteria are applied in exactly the same way throu
ghout the observational domain and the product generated by the algori
thm can be compared directly to model output. An independent test of t
he algorithm on data for which high-resolution dual-Doppler observatio
ns are available shows that the convective-stratiform separation algor
ithm is consistent with the physical definitions of convective and str
atiform precipitation. The vertical structure algorithm presents the f
requency distribution of radar reflectivity as a function of height an
d thus summarizes in a single plot the vertical structure of all the r
adar echoes observed during a month (or any other time period). Separa
te plots reveal the essential differences in structure between the con
vective and stratiform echoes. Tests yield similar results (within les
s than 10%) for monthly rain statistics regardless of the technique us
ed for estimating the precipitation, as long as the radar reflectivity
values are adjusted to agree with monthly rain gauge data. It makes l
ittle difference whether the adjustment is by monthly mean rates or pe
rcentiles. Further tests show that l-h sampling is sufficient to obtai
n an accurate estimate of monthly rain statistics.