J. Bouyer et al., PERFORMANCE OF ODDS RATIOS OBTAINED WITH A JOB-EXPOSURE MATRIX AND INDIVIDUAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MISCLASSIFICATION ERRORS, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 21(4), 1995, pp. 265-271
Objectives Individual assessment of exposure by experts and the use of
a job-exposure matrix are the two main methods of evaluating past occ
upational exposures in community-based case-referent studies. The obje
ctive of this study was to compare the performance of the estimations
of the odds ratio in the two methods. This paper focuses on job-exposu
re matrices whose entries consist of proportions of persons exposed. M
ethods simulations were used to compare the variances of the estimatio
ns of the odds ratios obtained with the two methods and to study the c
onsequences with respect to bias and the precision of the odds ratios
estimated for misclassifications of exposure produced by either the ex
perts or the matrix. Results When there was no misclassification, the
results showed that the precision obtained with the job exposure matri
x was about three times less than that achieved by experts in a large
range of practical situations. However, when potential errors of expos
ure assessment were taken into account, the simulations suggested that
the test of the hypothesis OR = 1 against the alternative OR not equa
l 1 when exposure was assessed with an unbiased job-exposure matrix ha
d a statistical power close to that obtained when exposure was assesse
d by an expert with high sensibility and specificity. Conclusions The
evaluation of exposure with an unbiased job-exposure matrix in studies
of the association between exposure and disease had a statistical pow
er close to that expected in practice with a good expert in the large
range of practical situations which were investigated. Key terms case-
referent studies, occupational exposure, simulation study.