The pattern of arms production in the developing world has often been
described as a series of gradual and progressive steps leading to grea
ter self-sufficiency in the design, development, and manufacturing of
weapon systems. The development of the defense industry in the Republi
c of Korea has been a near-textbook example of this process. Starting
with almost no arms production in the early 1970s, South Korea by the
mid-1990s had built up one of the most impressive defense industrial b
ases in the developing world. Since the mid-1980s, South Korea has inc
reasingly emphasized the indigenous development and design, as well as
the local production, of weapon systems. The ROK has initiated severa
l ambitious indigenous arms programs, including local production of th
e American F-16 fighter. At the same time, South Korea faces mounting
obstacles as it attempts to progress up the ''ladder of production'' t
oward greater autonomy in defense production. The country's defense in
dustrial base is heavily overcapacitized and still highly dependent on
foreign technology. Several barriers to the further indigenization of
arms production can be identified, including (1) a low level of inter
est on the part of South Korean private industry in over-involving its
elf in arms production; (2) a preference on the part of the ROK milita
ry for license-producing foreign weapon systems over devoting signific
ant time and resources to support indigenous research and development;
and (3) various structural weaknesses in the ROK defense R&D base, in
cluding poor linkages between the defense R&D and manufacturing bases,
a passive management system in local military production, weak design
and systems integration skills, and a lack of long-range R&D planning
. The ROK arms industries presently appear to be at a ''technology pla
teau,'' and as South Korean indigenization efforts expand, so do the h
oles in its defense industrial base become more egregious. Weapons man
ufacturing does not necessarily get any easier the further up the ladd
er one progresses. At the same time, South Korea is not likely to aban
don its indigenous arms industries or its ambitions to become more sel
f-sufficient in weapons design and development. Local defense industri
es are still perceived to be important national assets, essential to e
nsuring a secure and reliable source of arms for national defense, as
well as a driver of considerable high-tech activities. In addition, th
e overall technological advancement of the ROK is continuing, and loca
l high-technology industries could help underwrite further indigenizat
ion efforts. In the long run, overcoming the technology plateau may be
less a technological problem for the ROK than a bureaucratic, organiz
ational, and structural one.