H. Gislason et al., BURST ABDOMEN AND INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER MAJOR GASTROINTESTINAL OPERATIONS - COMPARISON OF 3 CLOSURE TECHNIQUES, The European journal of surgery, 161(5), 1995, pp. 349-354
Objective: To compare the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional he
rnia after three different techniques of closure of the abdominal wall
after major gastrointestinal operations. Design: Prospective, randomi
sed, controlled trial. Setting: University hospital, Norway. Subjects:
599 adults who underwent major operations for gastrointestinal condit
ions between December 1990 and February 1992. Interventions: Patients
were randomised in three groups for abdominal wall closure by continuo
us mass polyglyconate (Maxon) double suture with loop, continuous mass
polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), and interrupted polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) (l
ayered for transverse and mass for midline incisions). Main outcome me
asures: Burst abdomen during the postoperative period, and incisional
hernia after one year follow up. Results: The incidence of wound dehis
cence was 2% and of incisional hernia at one year 7%. There were no di
fferences in the rate of dehiscence among the groups, but there were s
ignificantly more hernias in the polyglyconate group (19/164, 12%) com
pared with the two in which polyglactin 910 was used (16/327, 5%). Wou
nd infections developed in 84/583 of our patients (14%) and the incide
nce was closely associated with emergency operations and contamination
. Wound complications were not associated with the closure technique.
Conclusions: Wound infection is the most important single factor in th
e development of burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The continuous c
losure technique is quicker, cheaper, and as safe as the interrupted t
echnique.