Ja. Douglas et al., ITEM-BUNDLE DIF HYPOTHESIS-TESTING - IDENTIFYING SUSPECT BUNDLES AND ASSESSING THEIR DIFFERENTIAL FUNCTIONING, Journal of educational measurement, 33(4), 1996, pp. 465-484
This article proposes two multidimensional IRT model-based methods of
selecting item bundles (clusters of not necessarily adjacent items cho
sen according to some organizational principle) suspected of displayin
g DIF amplification. The approach embodied in these two methods is ins
pired by Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) multidimensional model for
DIF. Each bundle selected by these methods constitutes a DIF amplifica
tion hypothesis. When SIBTEST(Shealy & Stout, 1993b) confirms DIF ampl
ification in selected bundles, differential bundle functioning (DBF) i
s said to occur. Three real data examples illustrate the two methods f
or suspect bundle selection. The effectiveness of the methods is argue
d on statistical grounds. A distinction between benign and adverse DIF
is made. The decision whether flagged DIF items or DBF bundles displa
y benign or adverse DIF/DBF must depend in part on nonstatistical cons
truct validity arguments. Conducting DBF analyses using these methods
should help in the identification of the causes of DIF/DBF.