PHASE I-II AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF A NEW FOTEMUSTINE SCHEDULE INADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER

Citation
A. Lecesne et al., PHASE I-II AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDY OF A NEW FOTEMUSTINE SCHEDULE INADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER, Lung cancer, 13(1), 1995, pp. 69-78
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01695002
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
69 - 78
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-5002(1995)13:1<69:PIAPSO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Fotemustine, a new nitrosourea derivative has already demonstrated act ivity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to improve its t herapeutic index, we designed a protocol in which Fotemustine was deli vered with dose escalation on 3 consecutive days as induction therapy followed by a 5-week rest period. Maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data were assessed during this Phase I-II study and reported here, Patients and methods: Ninete en patients with metastatic (17) or locally advanced (2) NSCLC were in cluded in the present study. Ten of those with metastatic disease had brain metastases and 15 had previously received chemotherapy. Fotemust ine was given at 50 mg/m(2) on day 1-2-3 (group 1: four patients), 75 mg/m(2) on day 1-2-3 (group 2: 16 patients including two who had alrea dy received 50 mg/m(2)) and 100 mg/m(2) on day 1-2-3 (group 3: one pat ient). Results: The maximal tolerated dose was 75 mg/m(2) on day 1-2-3 (total cumulated dose 225 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, we observed 2 5% of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and 31% of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. One patient died of pulmonary infection during aplasia. No other signific ant toxicity occurred. Of the 17 evaluable patients, one obtained a PR lasting 6 months in group 2 and 1 PR lasting 3 months in group 3. No significant difference was noted in the AUC between days 1, 2 or 3 in any of the seven patients in whom a pharmacokinetic study of Fotemusti ne was performed. Conclusion: Administered on 3 consecutive days, Fote mustine seems to be less effective and more toxic than other schedules tested in NSCLC. Despite the quality of the two responses observed, t his protocol has been discontinued and the standard administration on days 1 and 8 remains the schedule of choice in NSCLC.