One of the main hypotheses formulated to explain why marsh birds, wild
fowl, and shorebirds forage at night postulates that the birds prefer
to feed at night because the feeding opportunities are most profitable
then. To investigate this hypothesis, we compare day- and night-time
availability and describe the diel abundance rhythm of swimming and be
nthic organisms inhabiting the shallow waters of a tropical lagoon com
plex in northeastern Venezuela. Three sampling techniques were used by
day and by night: net sampling for swimming organisms, core sampling
for those in the sediments (10 cm deep), and sight counts for organism
s on the surface of substrata. Overall, in the case of swimming organi
sms, fishes, isopods, amphipods, shrimps (Penaeus spp.), and corixids
were 3-30 times more abundant at night than during daytime. In general
, infaunal organisms were about equally abundant during the day and th
e night, or slightly more abundant during the day. At the surface, iso
pods, amphipods, and polychaetes were greater than 10 times more abund
ant at night than during the day. However, gastropods were slightly mo
re numerous during daytime on the substrata, while pelecypods were abo
ut equally numerous during day- and night-time. Fiddler crabs (Uca sp.
) were generally more available during daytime. Considering all organi
sms together, the prey for marsh birds, wildfowl, and shorebirds were
significantly more abundant at night. In conclusion, tactile-foraging
species (e.g., spoonbills, skimmers, ibises, dabbling ducks, and sever
al species of shorebirds) should profit by foraging only at night and
resting during the day, and foraging during daylight only to top up a
nighttime deficit. On the other hand, despite limited nighttime visual
capacity, some sight-feeding species (e.g., herons, plovers) may take
advantage of increased prey availability at night, at least on moonli
t nights.