Study objective: To determine whether the environment of a moving ambu
lance affects the ability of out-of-hospital care providers to auscult
ate breath sounds. Methods: Out-of-hospital care providers assessed br
eath sounds with a previously described breath-sounds model in a quiet
environment (control) and in a moving ambulance. The setting was a no
nurban emergency medical services system and an interhospital transpor
t agency based at a 600-plus-bed tertiary care center. The participant
s were physicians, transport nurses, and advanced life support EMS pro
viders routinely involved in the emergency out-of-hospital treatment a
nd transportation of the ill and injured. The accuracy with which part
icipants identified the presence or absence of breath sounds in the tw
o environments was compared with the use of the chi(2) test, with the
alpha-value set at .05. Results: The accuracy of breath-sounds assessm
ent in the control environment was 96% (251 of 260); the sensitivity w
as 96% and the specificity 97%. The accuracy of breath-sounds assessme
nt in the experimental environment was 54% (140 of 260); the sensitivi
ty was .09% and the specificity 98%. Participants were significantly l
ess likely to hear breath sounds in the moving ambulance than in the q
uiet room (P<.001). Conclusion: Assessment of breath sounds is hampere
d by the environment of a moving ambulance.