LUMINAL TRANSPORT-SYSTEM FOR H+ ORGANIC CATIONS IN THE RAT PROXIMAL TUBULE - KINETICS, DEPENDENCE ON PH - SPECIFICITY AS COMPARED WITH THE CONTRALUMINAL ORGANIC CATION-TRANSPORT SYSTEM/
C. David et al., LUMINAL TRANSPORT-SYSTEM FOR H+ ORGANIC CATIONS IN THE RAT PROXIMAL TUBULE - KINETICS, DEPENDENCE ON PH - SPECIFICITY AS COMPARED WITH THE CONTRALUMINAL ORGANIC CATION-TRANSPORT SYSTEM/, Pflugers Archiv, 430(4), 1995, pp. 477-492
The efflux of radiolabelled organic cations from the tubular lumen int
o proximal tubular cells was investigated by using the stop-flow micro
perfusion method. The efflux rate increased in the sequence: N-1-methy
lnicotinamide (NMeN(+))< cimetidine < tetraethylammonium (TEA(+))< N-m
ethyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP(+)). Preloading the animals by i.v. infu
sion or pre perfusion of the peritubular capillaries with NMeN(+) incr
eased the efflux rate of MPP(+). Luminal efflux was also augmented whe
n the tubular solution was made alkaline with HCO3- or phosphate, wher
eby HCO3- is more effective than phosphate. Replacement of Na+ by Csshowed no effect. With i.v. preloading the animals with NMeN(+) and wi
th 25 mM HCO3- in the luminal perfusate the 2-s effflux follows kineti
cs with a Michaelis constant K-m = 0.21 mmol/l and maximal flux J(max)
= 0.42 pmol . cm(-1). s(-1) and a permeability term with P=37.7 mu m(
2) . s(-1). Comparing the apparent luminal inhibitory constant values
for MPP(+) (Ki(l,MPP+)) with the apparent contraluminal Ki(cl,NMeN+) v
alues of substrates of homologous series, it was found that (1) limita
tion by molecular size occurs at the contraluminal cell side earlier t
han at the luminal cell side; (2) affinity increases with hydrophobici
ty of the substrates at the luminal cell side, with a steeper or equal
slope than at the contraluminal cell side; (3) affinity increases wit
h basicity (i.e. pKa values) at the luminal cell side with a steeper s
lope than at the contraluminal cell side. Taken together, substrates w
ith low hydrophobicity and low basicity interact at the luminal cell s
ide more weakly than at the contraluminal cell side. On the other hand
large, hydrophobic substrates have, at the luminal cell side, a highe
r affinity than at the contralumi nal cell side. Many substrates, howe
ver, have equal affinity at the luminal and contraluminal cell sides.