D. Leenhardt et al., A SURVEY OF SEVERAL AGROCLIMATIC SOIL-WATER BALANCE MODELS WITH REFERENCE TO THEIR SPATIAL APPLICATION, European journal of agronomy, 4(1), 1995, pp. 1-14
This survey evaluates the applicability of the principal categories of
soil water models for studying the variablility of crop water balance
at regional scales. For each model attention is given to the definiti
on of the sphere of validity, the underlying hypotheses and the data r
equirements. For most applications of such models at the regional scal
e, model simplification increases with the extent of the application a
rea. This review suggests that this option is not theoretically justif
ied. Simplified approaches - either analogue or empirical - with few d
ata requirements, have limited validity and, because their physical si
gnificance is low, have state parameters with poorly-defined means of
measurement or cumbersome calibration procedures. Mechanistic approach
es need more data, but allow for a larger range of boundary conditions
. Thus, they might be better adapted to spatial applications, where th
e variation in local conditions is often large. The problem is, theref
ore, whether to use a physically-based model, where parameterisation i
s approximated, or a more easily parameterised, simplified model which
is often working beyond its limits. To answer this question more rese
arch is necessary on the quantification of the sources of error of mod
el predictions.