E. Hardman et al., FRONTAL INTERHEMISPHERIC ASYMMETRY - SELF-REGULATION AND INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN HUMANS, Neuroscience letters, 221(2-3), 1997, pp. 117-120
Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemisph
eric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites
F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) bio
feedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts ei
ther towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly
ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional
strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activat
ion, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 receiv
ed no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-scr
een rocket-skip, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an
increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisph
ere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (
relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x sessi
on x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the stra
tegy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct di
rection shifts in the final third of each session during both trial ty
pes (P < 0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong wi
thin session learning effect (P < 0.0037) with poor performance in the
early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects hi
gh on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with righ
t hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first
demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry
. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.