Ps. Helliwell et M. Ohara, SHARED CARE BETWEEN HOSPITAL AND GENERAL-PRACTICE - AN AUDIT OF DISEASE-MODIFYING DRUG-MONITORING IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS, British journal of rheumatology, 34(7), 1995, pp. 673-676
To assess the correspondence between ideal and actual monitoring for d
isease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and the reasons for protocol fai
lure, and the sharing of this task between primary and secondary care,
we studied 249 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a single distric
t general hospital. Ideal monitoring protocols were derived from data
sheets and from the rheumatological literature. Overall the ideal prot
ocol was followed in 65% of cases: this ranged from 93% for methotrexa
te to 26% for sodium aurothiromalate. Most of the monitoring was done
in general practice (e.g. 67% of all blood tests) and, with some excep
tions, general practitioners (GPs) were willing to perform this task.
However, many GPs reported logistic differences with specimen transfer
and expressed the need for more information and support. Poor communi
cation between hospital, patient and GP was also found to be a cause o
f protocol failure.