P. Axelsson et al., ORTHOSIS AS PROGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT IN LUMBAR FUSION - NO PREDICTIVE VALUE IN 50 CASES FOLLOWED PROSPECTIVELY, Journal of spinal disorders, 8(4), 1995, pp. 284-288
To evaluate pain relief in a lumbar orthosis as a predictor for good c
linical results after solid fusion, all patients scheduled for such a
surgical procedure were preoperatively encouraged to use an orthosis,
soft or rigid, for 3 weeks. Grade of back pain relief as a percent usi
ng the orthosis was assessed by the patients and was registered before
surgery. After surgery, at 1-year follow-up, patients with nonunion d
emonstrated radiographically were excluded from the series. Thus, 50 p
atients with solid fusion could be identified and followed for at leas
t 2 years prospectively. At follow-up these 50 patients graded the pai
n relief induced by the fusion. In the preoperative corset test, 31 pa
tients experienced significant back pain relief, meaning a reduction o
f at least 50%. No applicable correlation was found, however, between
outcome in this corset test and the eventual clinical result expressed
as improvement/no improvement after solid fusion. The two types of or
thoses did not differ in this aspect. We conclude that the orthosis, r
igid or soft, is not a useful instrument when selecting patients for l
umbar fusion.