Jt. Halavaara et Ae. Lamminen, MNDPDP AS A NEGATIVE HEPATIC CONTRAST AGENT - EVALUATION OF STIR IMAGING COMPARED WITH T1-WEIGHTED SE AND GE TECHNIQUES, Journal of computer assisted tomography, 21(1), 1997, pp. 94-99
Our goal was to assess the utility of manganese dipyridoxyl diphosphat
e (MnDPDP) as a negative hepatic contrast agent in short inversion tim
e IR MRI (STIR). Twenty patients with focal liver lesions (15 with met
astatic disease, 5 with hemangiomas) underwent MRI (T1-weighted SE, br
eath-hold GE, and STIR sequences) before and after infusion of MnDPDP
(5 mu mol/kg). We then compared the results obtained with each sequenc
e for hepatic parenchymal enhancement, lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noi
se ratio (C/N) measurements, and the number of focal liver lesions obs
erved in pre-and postcontrast images. Hepatic enhancement values of 25
.3 +/- 9.7 and 33.6 +/- 2.7% (mean +/- SEM) were obtained for the T1-w
eighted SE and GE sequences, respectively. The STIR sequence showed 78
.9 +/- 2.1% negative enhancement (decrease of parenchymal signal inten
sity). Although a significant (p < 0.0001) C/N increase was seen after
MnDPDP administration for all sequences, STIR showed the highest incr
ease (149.0 +/- 25.5%) compared with T1-weighted SE (58.5 +/- 12.7%) a
nd GE (83.3 +/- 7.2%) sequences. Similarly, more lesions for all seque
nces were detected, but again STIR showed the greatest postcontrast in
crease (29.0%). MnDPDP is an effective hepatic contrast agent. As both
the negative hepatic enhancement and the increase in lesion-to-liver
CIN were superior with the STIR sequence when compared with the positi
ve enhancement and CIN values produced by the T1-weighted sequences, i
t should be considered for inclusion in the imaging protocol for patie
nts with focal liver disease.