VALSALVA LEAK POINT PRESSURES IN WOMEN WITH GENUINE STRESS-INCONTINENCE - REPRODUCIBILITY, EFFECT OF CATHETER CALIBER, AND CORRELATIONS WITH OTHER MEASURES OF URETHRAL RESISTANCE
Rc. Bump et al., VALSALVA LEAK POINT PRESSURES IN WOMEN WITH GENUINE STRESS-INCONTINENCE - REPRODUCIBILITY, EFFECT OF CATHETER CALIBER, AND CORRELATIONS WITH OTHER MEASURES OF URETHRAL RESISTANCE, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(2), 1995, pp. 551-557
OBJECTIVES: The Valsalva leak point pressure has been promoted as an a
lternative to urethral pressure profilometry as a measure of urethral
resistance in women with genuine stress incontinence. Our aims were to
evaluate the reproducibility of the Valsalva leak point pressure, to
assess the effect of catheter caliber on the Valsalva leak point press
ure, and to compare vesical Valsalva leak point pressure to other meas
ures of urethral resistance. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty consecutive women wit
h genuine stress incontinence underwent duplicate Valsalva leak point
pressure determinations by use of 8F and 3F vesical and 8F vaginal cat
heters. Subjects also underwent a standard resting urethral pressure p
rofilometry, cough leak point pressure determinations, and pressure-fl
ow micturition studies. RESULTS: Leakage was demonstrated on both Vals
alva maneuvers in approximately 80% of subjects with both catheters. i
n subjects who leaked with both strains there was an extremely high co
rrelation between the test-retest Valsalva leak point pressure within
both catheters. The intercatheter correlation between the 8F and 3F Va
lsalva leak point pressures was significant but much weaker than the i
ntracatheter correlations; 8F Valsalva leak point pressures were signi
ficantly higher than 3F Valsalva leak point pressures, although there
were individual exceptions to this observation. Urethral pressure prof
ilometry measures and micturition opening pressures were poorly correl
ated with Valsalva leak point pressure. Cough and vaginal Valsalva lea
k point pressures were significantly correlated with vesical Valsalva
leak point pressure, but cough leak point pressures were significantly
higher and vaginal Valsalva leak point pressures were significantly l
ower than the vesical Valsalva leak point pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Valsa
lva leak point pressure is a simple and reproducible technique for eva
luating urethral resistance in women with genuine stress incontinence.
However, variations in Valsalva leak point pressure measurement must
be precisely described, standardized, and validated before a technique
can be advocated for clinical use.