M. Kanke et al., APPLICATION OF CURDLAN TO CONTROLLED DRUG-DELIVERY .2. IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO DRUG-RELEASE STUDIES OF THEOPHYLLINE-CONTAINING CURDLAN TABLETS, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin, 18(8), 1995, pp. 1104-1108
Tablets (300 mg) having two different surface areas were prepared from
spray-dried particles of curdlan (100 mg)/theophylline(200 mg). Drug
release from the tablets was studied in vitro and in vivo. The in vitr
o drug release from a tablet with a larger surface area (Tab L) was fa
ster than that with a smaller one (Tab S). The water uptake of Tab L w
as larger than that of Tab S, probably due to the difference in the ta
blets' surface areas. However, the water uptake was not a rate-determi
ning step for the drug release from curdlan tablets containing a large
amount of theophylline. A straight line was obtained when release % w
as plotted vs. time. The slope of each curve was calculated as 0.59 fo
r Tab L and 0.58 for Tab S. This indicates that the release mechanism
is non-fickian diffusion controlled. In addition, the curdlan tablets
or theophylline powder were administered orally to 5 healthy volunteer
s, and saliva concentrations of theophylline were determined. Each sal
iva concentration was converted to plasma concentration using the sali
va to plasma ratio of the drug in each subject. The AUC of Tab L was n
early the same as that of powder, while the AUC of Tab S was smaller t
han that of powder. The mean residence times (MRTs) of theophylline po
wder, Tab S and Tab L were 11.1+/-1.5, 25.4+/-6.3 and 17.1+/-1.5 h (N=
4-5, mean+/-S.D.), respectively. The mean dissolution times (MDTs) of
Tab L in vivo and Tab S in vivo were 5.0+/-2.1 (N=5, mean+/-S.D.) and
13.9+/-5.4h (N=4, meam+/-S.D.), respectively. On the other hand, the M
DTs of Tab L in vitro and Tab S in vitro were 4.8 and 11.2h, respectiv
ely. In vivo drug release was very similar to in vitro drug release in
both tablets. The lower bioavailability of Tab S suggested that the d
rug release had not been completed during the gastrointestinal transit
period. Tab L would thus be a better controlled release form than Tab
S.