P. Swart et al., THE ACCURACY OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TUBAL PATHOLOGY - A METAANALYSIS, Fertility and sterility, 64(3), 1995, pp. 486-491
Objective: To assess the Value of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in diagn
osing tubal patency and peritubal adhesions using laparoscopy with chr
omopertubation as the gold standard. Design: Meta-analysis of 20 studi
es comparing HSG and laparoscopy for tubal patency and peritubal adhes
ions. Patients: Four thousand one hundred seventy-nine patients with i
nfertility in 20 studies. Intervention: Hysterosalpingography and diag
nostic laparoscopy as part of infertility workup. Main Outcome Measure
: Tubal patency and peritubal adhesions. Results: For tubal patency th
e reported sensitivity and specificity differed between studies. In a
subset of studies that evaluated HSG and laparoscopy independently, a
point estimate of 0.65 for sensitivity and 0.83 for specificity was ca
lculated. For peritubal adhesions a summary receiver operating charact
eristic curve could be estimated. Conclusions: Although HSG is of limi
ted use for detecting tubal patency because of its low sensitivity, it
s high specificity makes it a useful test for ruling in tubal obstruct
ion. For the evaluation of peritubal adhesions HSG is not reliable.