Principally concerned with the evolution of the Lower Mississippi Vall
ey (LMV), the Fisk (1944) investigation provided one of the first desc
riptions of the stratigraphic and structural framework of the region.
The study provided new data for hydrogeological studies by state and f
ederal agencies. The Fisk report was the basic reference for one of th
e earliest studies of a complex regional aquifer system - the Mississi
ppi embayment project. Begun by the US Geological Survey (USGS) in 195
7, the study covered the Lower Mississippi Region north of the 32nd pa
rallel. A study of ground water in the alluvium in the upper and centr
al part of the region was completed by the US Army Corps of Engineers
in 1964 (Krinitzsky and Wire, 1964). A study, completed in 1970 by the
USGS for the Mississippi River Commission (MRC) as part of a plan to
export water to west Texas and New Mexico, assessed the availability o
f fresh ground water in the entire Lower Mississippi Region (Boswell,
1970). Some results of this study were included in Appendix C of the L
ower Mississippi Region Comprehensive Study Coordinating Committee (19
74). During the last 20 years, hundreds of hydrogeological studies hav
e been made in the region, and several computer models of aquifer syst
ems have evolved. The USGS Regional Aquifer System Analysis (RASA) Pro
gram included the region in two models: the Mississippi embayment aqui
fer system and the Gulf Coast regional aquifer system. RASA models est
ablish a geological, hydrological, and geochemical database for use in
regional and local development and in the management of ground-water
resources. The Mississippi embayment study unit of the National Water
Quality Assessment Program is currently underway. Continuing hydrogeol
ogical studies are needed to assess in more detail the hydrogeology of
all aquifers in the region. The vast alluvial aquifer system is of sp
ecial importance because it is the largest ground-water reservoir in t
he region, and it is the most susceptible to contamination and the eff
ects of mismanagement.