Ph. Richardson et al., EVALUATION OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING FOR THE DISTRESS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABNORMAL CERVICAL SMEAR RESULT, British journal of health psychology, 1, 1996, pp. 327-338
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine the
relative effects of the provision of information and of cognitive-beh
avioural counselling on the psychological adjustment of women who had
previously been informed of an abnormal cervical smear result and subs
equently required a further diagnostic procedure (colposcopy examinati
on) and treatment. Altogether, 219 women were randomized to one of two
groups: (a) counselling plus the provision of an information leaflet,
and (b) information leaflet only. Patients in both groups received an
information leaflet with their first colposcopy appointment. Patients
in the counselling group also attended a counselling interview prior
to their colposcopy examination. The Abnormal Smears Questionnaire (a
measure of specific concerns relating to the smear result and subseque
nt diagnostic and treatment procedures), together with the Spielberger
State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1), the General Health Questionnaire (
GHQ-30), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS-36) were administered pr
e-colposcopy, post-colposcopy, pre-treatment, post-treatment and at th
ree- and six-month follow-ups. Additionally a counselling evaluation q
uestionnaire was completed by women in the counselling group after the
ir colposcopy examination. High levels of distress were reported by bo
th groups of patients on all measures prior to the colposcopy examinat
ion, with a subsequent highly significant post-colposcopy reduction, a
gain in both groups. There were no significant differences in psycholo
gical functioning between the two groups at post-colposcopy assessment
. Some minor differences emerged between the two groups at treatment a
nd follow-up assessments but following analysis of covariance these we
re interpreted as artifacts of baseline differences between the two gr
oups on the measures concerned. Therefore, the hypothesis that cogniti
ve-behavioural counselling plus information would have an incremental
benefit over the simple provision of an information leaflet was not su
pported. Possible interpretations of these results are discussed.