Je. Porter, TOOLS, METHODS, AND STRATEGIES - THE BENCHMARKING EFFORT FOR NETWORKING CHILDRENS HOSPITALS (BENCHMARK), The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 21(8), 1995, pp. 395-406
Background: In 1992, 12 large children's hospitals established the Ben
chmarking Effort for Networking Children's Hospitals (BENCHmark). The
goal was for the BENCHmark effort to supplement the hospitals' continu
ous quality improvement (CQI) programs and to speed adoption of best p
ractices from peer institutions. For three years, the hospitals have b
een comparing data on cost, quality, and speed indicators. Also, ''bes
t practice'' groups have met to share information on how processes can
be improved. Results: The BENCHmark hospitals have experienced signif
icant process improvement in areas such as emergency department waitin
g time and admitting process time. Example: The BENCHmark hospitals se
lected admitting as one of the first best practice groups to meet. Int
erdisciplinary staff from all BENCHmark hospitals met three times over
the course of a year to define their indicator and share information
on best practices. St Louis Children's Hospital, as a result, institut
ed a pre-arrival team and cross-trained staff, with the result being a
reduction of admitting processing time from 58 minutes to 19 minutes.
Same-day surgery patients now bypass the admitting department and go
directly to the surgical floor. Patient and surgeon satisfaction has i
ncreased greatly. Conclusions: Hospitals that are planning to benchmar
k are encouraged to reach consensus on project goals and to focus on i
ndicators that provide a clear business advantage. Physician involveme
nt is key to improving performance and physicians will only be engaged
if the hospitals against whom they are benchmarked are considered pee
rs. Being willing to share initial data openly seems to be a key facto
r in determining successful integration of the BENCHmark process into
hospital CQI efforts. The BENCHmark project has been so successful tha
t a second group of 12 comparable pediatric institutions, known as the
Network II, has been established.