V. Widmarkpetersson et al., CANCER-PATIENT AND STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF CARING VS CLINICAL CARE, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 10(4), 1996, pp. 227-233
Two questions were investigated: (1) whether cancer patients (n = 72)
and staff (n = 63) have different cognitive representations of the con
cepts 'caring' (in Swedish: omvardnad) and 'clinical care' (in Swedish
: vard), and (2) whether two different wordings of the response catego
ries used by patients and staff to rank the perceived importance of 50
specific caring behaviors ('Old' response format: 'of importance'-'of
no importance' vs 'New' format: 'more or less important') in relation
to these concepts would produce different results. A Swedish question
naire version of the CARE-Q instrument was used. Participants were ran
domized to one of four research conditions: (1) Caring/Old, (2) Caring
/New, (3) Clinical care/Old, and (4) Clinical care/New, and asked to r
ank the importance of the 50 CARE-Q behaviors for that specific concep
t/response format combination. Results demonstrated that response form
ats did not affect patient or staff answers. Neither group did to any
great extent value CARE-Q behaviors differently when regarded as examp
les of 'caring' vs 'clinical care'. The assumption that different cogn
itive representations of the concepts or that a specific wording of re
sponse categories had affected previous CARE-Q results was not substan
tiated.