A. Thomson et al., REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTOR PREVALENCE IN TASMANIA - ARE THEY CONSISTENT WITH THE INCREASED CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 25(4), 1995, pp. 290-296
Background: The death rate from cardiovascular disease in Tasmania has
been among the highest in Australian States for a number of years. Th
e North-West (NW) and Northern regions of Tasmania account for most of
the increased mortality. Aims: To determine the prevalence of cardiov
ascular risk factors in the North and NW regions of Tasmania and to as
certain whether any differences are consistent with the regional patte
rns of mortality for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) within the State. M
ethods: The design of the study was almost identical to the previous N
ational Heart Foundation (NHF) Risk Factor Prevalence Survey conducted
in 1989. The subjects, aged 20-69 years, were randomly selected from
the Electoral Roll with 1146 subjects participating in the North and 1
219 in the NW. Subjects answered a detailed questionnaire and then und
erwent a brief physical examination with venipuncture for blood lipids
. Hobart data from the NHF Risk Factor Prevalence Survey in 1989 were
used as an estimate of risk factor prevalence in the Southern region.
Results: In both males and females, mean systolic blood pressure was s
ignificantly higher in the NW than the South which was in turn higher
than the North. Mean serum cholesterol levels in males were higher in
the NW than the North. Smoking behaviour was similar in males and fema
les in all regions. Males and females in the NW and North were more in
active than those in the South. Similar proportions in all regions wer
e on either 'no specific' or 'fat modified' diets. Body mass index in
males and females was higher in the NW and North but waist to hip rati
os failed to show a consistent-trend Conclusions: While the NW has an
unfavourable risk factor profile compared with the South, the North do
es not. The risk factor data are broadly consistent with, but unlikely
to be sufficient to explain fully, the regional differences in mortal
ity from IHD.