In this retrospective study, we assess the accuracy, confidence levels
, and viewing times of two generalist pathologists using both dynamic-
robotic telepathology and conventional light microscopy (LM) to render
diagnoses on a test set of 100 consecutive routine surgical pathology
cases. The objective is to determine whether telepathology will allow
a pathology group practice at a diagnostic hub to provide routine dia
gnostic services to a remote hospital without an on-site pathologist.
For TP, glass slides were placed on the motorized stage of the robotic
microscope of a telepathology system by a senior laboratory technolog
ist in Iron Mountain, MI. Real-time control of the motorized microscop
e was then transferred to a pathologist in Milwaukee, WI, who viewed i
mages of the glass slides on a video monitor. The telepathologists def
erred rendering a diagnosis In 1.5% of casts. Clinically important con
cordance between the individual diagnoses rendered by telepathology an
d the ''truth'' diagnosis established by rereview of glass slides was
98.5%. In the telepathology mode, there were five incorrect diagnoses
out of a total of 197 diagnoses. In four cases in which the telepathol
ogy diagnosis was incorrect, the pathologist's diagnosis by LM was ide
ntical to that rendered by telepathology. These represent errors of in
terpretation and cannot be ascribed to telepathology. The certainty of
the pathologists with respect to their diagnoses was evaluated over t
ime. Results for tile first 50 cases served as baseline data. For the
second 50 cases, confidence in rendering a diagnosis in the telepathol
ogy mode was essentially identical to that of making a diagnosis in th
e LM viewing mode. Viewing times in the telepathology mode also improv
ed with more experience using the telepathology system. These results
support the concept that an off-site pathologist using dynamic-robotic
telepathology can substitute for an on-site pathologist as a service
provider.