Control over deployment of U.S. armed forces has been one of the most
hotly contested issues in foreign policy between the president and Con
gress in recent years. Yet despite the lingering legacy of Vietnam, Co
ngress has never fully forced presidents to curtail U.S. military acti
vities through use of the War Powers Resolution, its appropriations po
wers, or other legislation. I attempt to show that although Congress g
enerally leaves military policy to the executive branch, it occasional
ly tries to interject itself into policy-making when there are suffici
ent political incentives. I develop a model to explain what leads Cong
ress to periodically use the War Powers Resolution and other legislati
on in an attempt to curtail U.S. military operations abroad, and find
that public opinion, protracted conflicts, divided government, and vio
lence against United States citizens all exercise statistically signif
icant impacts on congressional behavior.