M. Schieppati et al., EARLY AND LATE STRETCH RESPONSES OF HUMAN FOOT MUSCLES INDUCED BY PERTURBATION OF STANCE, Experimental Brain Research, 105(3), 1995, pp. 411-422
In eight subjects standing on a movable platform, surface EMG activity
was recorded from the foot muscles extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) an
d flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) and from the leg muscles soleus (Sol)
and tibialis anterior (TA) during perturbations of upright stance. Per
turbations inducing foot dorsiflexion (upward tilt and backward transl
ation) evoked a short-latency response (SLR) and a medium-latency resp
onse (MLR) to stretch in the physiological extensors FDB and Sol, and
a long-latency response (LLR) in the physiological flexors EDB and TA.
Perturbations inducing plantar-flexion (downward tilt and forward tra
nslation) evoked the MLR in EDB and TA, and the LLR in FDB and Sol. Th
e latency of the FDB and Sol SLR was compared to that of the H and T r
eflexes evoked in the same muscles by electrical or mechanical stimula
tion, respectively. In both muscles, the T reflex and the SLR followed
the H reflex at delays accounted for by the different stimulation mod
e, indicating that the SLR induced in both muscles by upward tilt and
backward translation was a true autogenetic stretch reflex from spindl
e primaries. The time interval between the onset of SLR and of MLR was
significantly greater for the FDB than the Sol muscle, suggesting tha
t MLR is a spinal reflex travelling through slower peripheral afferent
pathways than SLR. From these latency differences and from the distan
ce between the muscles, we calculated in four subjects the conduction
velocity of the afferent fibres presumably responsible for the MLR in
FDB. This was about 29 m/s. LLRs were evoked in TA and EDB during upwa
rd tilt and backward translation, and in Sol and FDB during downward t
ilt, but not forward translation. LLRs did not adhere to a proximal-to
-distal pattern, since these could appear earlier in the foot than in
the leg muscles. All responses were modulated by perturbation type (ti
lt vs translation) and body posture (normal stance vs forward leaning)
. Both the large amplitude of the foot muscle responses and their temp
oral pattern indicate that the muscles acting on the toes play a major
role in stabilising posture. Their action increases in amplitude and
extends in time the foot-ground reaction force, thereby improving the
efficiency of the superimposed action of the leg muscle responses.-